Many thanks from me too David M
----- Original Message ----- From: "Krimel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2007 4:54 PM Subject: Re: [MD] Sneddon Thesis Part Two > Thanks Ant and Dan!!! > > I have really been looking forward to this. > > Krimel > > ------------------------------ > Mark Germine stated June 1st 2007: > > "I am much more familiar with Whitehead's metaphysics than Pirsig's. I > think the two are compatable." > > > Mark, > > Someone else who also thinks so is Andrew Sneddon who submitted an > excellent > > comparison between the MOQ and Whitehead's process philosophy as his M.A. > thesis. The first part of Andrew's thesis can be found via the following > link: > > www.robertpirsig.org/SneddonThesis.htm > > This half has been proof read again and corrected where necessary while > the > second part (which I've just finished formatting for the internet) can be > found via this link: > > www.robertpirsig.org/SneddonPartTwo.htm > > Many thanks again to Dan Glover for scanning the hardcopy of Andrew's > thesis > > which made it's e-publication a lot more straight forward. > > Best wishes, > > Anthony > www.robertpirsig.org > > > moq_discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
