At 11:30 AM 6/8/2007, you wrote:

> >
>
>[Marsha]
>
>It's just that SA can babble on like a brook clogged with acorns and
>it won't become attached to anonymous.   I, on the other hand, can
>easily be labeled something like a "new ager" and suffer long lasting
>humiliation.   Where's the fairness?
>
>
>[Ron]
>
>I do not view you as a "new ager" I term a new ager is someone
>who holds an old belief system but changes the symbols
>expressing it, I do not see you doing this. I see you
>as open and free.


Hi Ron,

Your sweet.

I don't see SA as a babbling brook clogged with acorns either.  He's 
just free not to be responsible for his words.

The problem is mine.  I want to talk about Lila, Life, Love, Freedom, 
the Feminine, DQ, chaos.  Anything I say will be incorrect.   It's 
too big and too small.   It's too universal and too personal.   And 
because this seems to be a men's club, I lose, and that is a public 
type of loss.  And I definitely cannot speak for all women.  I'm 
pretty brave, but not THAT brave.  Besides, I think the words would 
be irrational.  I'd try to form a sentence and by the time I got to 
the end, the beginning would have disappeared.  It would be easier to 
become a bee and dance it on the back of your hand.

so,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

thanks to SA for trying and you for being kind, but never mind.


Marsha








moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to