> [Krimel] > Virtual reality aside this is a very difficult point, this experience = > reality business. I whole heartedly agree that all we have is our > individual > experience, our individual realities. But I am equally willing to say, > purely as a matter of faith, that I believe we have experience "OF" > something. That our realities are constructed as representations "OF" > something. Call it TiTs. Call it objectivity. Call it Other. But when the > Hindus speak of Maya and the world as illusion I would say they are > referring to the confusion we experience when we confuse our individual > representation with that indefinable stuff that is independent of us. I > like > to think of it as DQ. >
DM: Yes, and we only experience that which changes us (photons hitting (aggressive sods!) eyes), or changes something that changes us (electron microscope), hence DQ it is, and repetitive changes are SQ. I agree, there's gotta be something causing these changes in us, and making sense of this whilst staying alive is the whole shebang. [Krimel] It is refreshing to hear you say this. It is one thing to argue about what this means but it is truly frustrating to be continuously discussing whether it "is". moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
