DM, Yeah, I ran into the same problem trying to read Dupree. After a couple of chapters the continuous process of translation gave me a headache and I moved on.
Krimel ------------------------------- Krim You see same and I see difference. Middle way? DM ----- Original Message ----- From: "Krimel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 1:00 PM Subject: Re: [MD] Is morality Hard Wired? > DM, > > Imagine that; a point getting lost here; who'da thunk it? > > Static latching seems to me to be nothing more than a high level of > resistance. Just as cause seem like 100% probability. While the patterns > of > resistance may be different in social or intellectual evolution the > process > itself and most of the rules apply. Good ideas get passed along... > Societies > that support their populations continue... > > Krimel > > --------------------------- > > Krim > > Hence my point that evolutionary theory is largely > Darwinian and is limited in its application elsewhere. > Did that get lost somewhere? > > DM > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Krimel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 11:27 PM > Subject: Re: [MD] Is morality Hard Wired? > > >> DM, >> Aren't they all? >> Krimel >> --------------------- >> >> Hi Krim >> >> Yes, but the latching mechanism,where there is one, >> may be very different. >> >> DM >> >>> DM, >>> >>> Static patterns act as resistance to the dynamic flow of energy. In a >>> river >>> it's the rocks. In mating it's incest taboos. In economics it's cost to >>> benefit ratios. >>> >>> Krimel >>> ------------------------- >>> Krim >>> >>> The analogy works some of the way but is limited, >>> as the valuing, selection & breeding criteria are different. >>> >>> DM >>> >>> ------------------------- >>>> [DM] >>>> Do we not need to understand how patterns emerge, why they persist, why >>>> they >>>> change, how levels emerge,etc? >>>> >>>> [Krimel] >>>> I suspect it has much to do with the consistency of the flow of energy >>>> into the system along the lines of Prigogine. >>>> >>>> [DM] >>>> (NB Darwin's suggestions are a useful subset of what happens >>>> across all the levels, but I object to Darwin's ideas being used >>>> beyond self-replicating reproductive-selective processes, although >>>> a good analogy is a good analogy ) >>>> >>>> [Krimel] >>>> You don't think societies and ideas are "self-replicating >>>> reproductive-selective processes?" >>>> >> >> >> >> moq_discuss mailing list >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> Archives: >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ >> > > moq_discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > > moq_discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
