DM, I may have used that excuse one too many times but as a wizard I am careful to avoid things that might many my head explode. I have seen the mess it can leave.
Krimel ---------------------------------- DM: I thought you were a wizard not a wimp. Headache! > DM, > > Yeah, I ran into the same problem trying to read Dupree. After a couple of > chapters the continuous process of translation gave me a headache and I > moved on. > > Krimel > > ------------------------------- > > Krim > > You see same and I see difference. Middle way? > > DM > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Krimel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 1:00 PM > Subject: Re: [MD] Is morality Hard Wired? > > >> DM, >> >> Imagine that; a point getting lost here; who'da thunk it? >> >> Static latching seems to me to be nothing more than a high level of >> resistance. Just as cause seem like 100% probability. While the patterns >> of >> resistance may be different in social or intellectual evolution the >> process >> itself and most of the rules apply. Good ideas get passed along... >> Societies >> that support their populations continue... >> >> Krimel >> >> --------------------------- >> >> Krim >> >> Hence my point that evolutionary theory is largely >> Darwinian and is limited in its application elsewhere. >> Did that get lost somewhere? >> >> DM >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Krimel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: <[email protected]> >> Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 11:27 PM >> Subject: Re: [MD] Is morality Hard Wired? >> >> >>> DM, >>> Aren't they all? >>> Krimel >>> --------------------- >>> >>> Hi Krim >>> >>> Yes, but the latching mechanism,where there is one, >>> may be very different. >>> >>> DM >>> >>>> DM, >>>> >>>> Static patterns act as resistance to the dynamic flow of energy. In a >>>> river >>>> it's the rocks. In mating it's incest taboos. In economics it's cost to >>>> benefit ratios. >>>> >>>> Krimel >>>> ------------------------- >>>> Krim >>>> >>>> The analogy works some of the way but is limited, >>>> as the valuing, selection & breeding criteria are different. >>>> >>>> DM >>>> >>>> ------------------------- >>>>> [DM] >>>>> Do we not need to understand how patterns emerge, why they persist, >>>>> why >>>>> they >>>>> change, how levels emerge,etc? >>>>> >>>>> [Krimel] >>>>> I suspect it has much to do with the consistency of the flow of energy >>>>> into the system along the lines of Prigogine. >>>>> >>>>> [DM] >>>>> (NB Darwin's suggestions are a useful subset of what happens >>>>> across all the levels, but I object to Darwin's ideas being used >>>>> beyond self-replicating reproductive-selective processes, although >>>>> a good analogy is a good analogy ) >>>>> >>>>> [Krimel] >>>>> You don't think societies and ideas are "self-replicating >>>>> reproductive-selective processes?" >>>>> >>> moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
