Hi Marsha It is a word I try to avoid. Yet other people find it very useful and valuable. Surely we do at times need to refer to some ultimate category, or original source, or ultimate meaning, or Nothing. Is this allowed? Or are you trying to shut people up? Do you have that right?
DM ----- Original Message ----- From: "MarshaV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 3:13 PM Subject: Re: [MD] a/theism > At 07:35 AM 6/12/2007, Gav wrote: > > >>this clarification moves us closer to a better >>understanding of the question. firstly it allows for a >>more exact logical positing of the problem by letting >>us imagine the possibility of the existence of such a >>thing as 'god'. >> > > Gav, > > No matter how you manipulate the definition, I find the word 'god' > equivalent to the word poopoo. Offensive! For me the word has very > low value. > > Sorry, I do not mean to offend you. > > > Marsha > > > > > > moq_discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
