> > [David previously]
> >> That resonates completely. Hard to live a life
> of quality when the
> >> culture tells us to live a life of possessions.
> Or the $ as SA puts it.
> >> Also, nothing wrong with an 'intellectually
> messy' life, far better
> >> than an 'intellectually clean' life where
> everything has its place
> >> and has no room for improvement.
[SA previously]
> > I agree David that intellectually messy is
> better than clean the way you define this here.
> > I would say in place of intellect one can put - ?
and answer
> this question, but the ? still remains. $ and ?
[David H.]
> The same ? doesn't remain but it's all ? so it does.
> Brilliant.
I had messy and clean backwards previously above.
I did agree with you David. With ? a static pattern
remains, with no degeneracy, and answers happen, as
you mention here, "...The same ? doesn't remain...",
thus, dynamic, creative intellectual valueing may
persist. It is about what we value, and it seems many
of us value the open, creative, natural flow. I value
this, due to 'it happens this way'. Just when we
think we may have it - boom, gone, a new intellectual
pattern emerges. Dynamic quality at its' best.
woods,
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Got a little couch potato?
Check out fun summer activities for kids.
http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=summer+activities+for+kids&cs=bz
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
