Quoting Ron Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> >
> > [Platt]
> > The good old days when good and evil were easily recognized seems
> > preferable to the current slow decline of Quality.
> >
> > [Ron]
> > Is'nt the knowledge of good and evil what got us all in trouble in the
>
> > first place?
> > {metaphorically} when the apple of knowledge was eaten the world split
>
> > in two.
> > when knowledge of quality emerged, it emerged intellectually as
> dualism.
> [Platt]
> Don't think so. Pirsig explains good and evil beginning from the ground
> (inorganic) up. It's built into the fabric of the universe if you accept
> Pirsig's thesis that the world is a moral order. But, he could be wrong.
> I happen to think he's right.
>
> [Ron]
> This is where I interpret it differently. You've been at this longer
> than I and you may be
> correct in regard to Pirsigs thesis but it then apears to me that MOQ is
> not offering
> anything new only a different definition of dualism.
I thought that Pirsig's idea that the world is a moral order was new, but
has Christianity being saying this all along? Is it just Pirsig's differing
moral
levels that are new?
Thanks.
Platt
-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
