[ian]> Marx was voted the greatest philosopher by a BBC "In Our Time" survey
last year
Unless one knows exactly how the survey was conducted, this kind of data
isworthless. Leave aside how representative or how knowledgeable the sampling
was.Generally how these surveys work is that either (a) there is a list to
choose fromor (b) the respondent can respond with any name they choose. [Case
(a) is just asubset of case (b).] Assume case (a) with a list of 19
philosophers.18 philosophers can get 5% of the vote each & Marx can get 10%,if
so Marx wins the survey. But what if the same people are asked "Who is
theworst philosopher of our time?" Marx gets 90% & 10% is distributed among
the18. So the result of the survey is: 18 philosophers get 5% vote for best
&1/2 % for worst, while Marx gets 10% for best & 90% for worst. There's
nolonger any reason to think Marx is the best philosopher.Craig
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
