Quoting ARLO J BENSINGER JR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> [Platt]
> Yes, we are not surprised that you consider Castro's Cuba a success. 
> 
> [Arlo]
> Gee, we've had this conversation before too. But I'll repeat myself one last
> time, seeing as you are now in full Limbaugh mode. I don't consider Cuba a
> success, I consider Cuba an embarrassment towards US foreign policy. 

Quote from Arlo: "I hardly see him (Castro) as an example of Marxist
failure."

 [Platt]
> Nor that you deny a connection between Marx's "original thinking" and the
> horrors of communist countries such as China and North Korea.
> 
> [Arlo]
> Unlike you, I've read and studied Marx. And I encourage anyone else to do so
> who actually believes the talk-radio bunk you dole out.
> 
> Marx's aims were perverted by people like Lenin, and finally Stalin, and then
> these subsequent nationalist dictatorships that, in good neocon tradition, 
> felt
> that people were too selfish and stupid and needed the strong hand of
> patriotism and nationalism to guide them.

Of course, Marx's ideas had nothing to do with the millions slaughtered in his
name. Yeah, right.  

> [Platt]
> The question was about nations, not isolated small groups. By the way, what
> ever happened to all those Hippie communes?
> 
> [Arlo]
> And I answered that. Nations everywhere that tried to apply Marx fell prey to
> neoconservative nationalistic bunk, and ended up propping up a regime that
> ruled through propaganda, unquestionable loyalty to the state, nationalistic
> pride to the point of arrogance, and the idea that this Glorious Nation myth
> was needed by the poor, stupid masses. 

Whatever happened to all those Hippie communes? Another question ducked.

> Marx, as I said here many time, as recently as in a good conversation with
> Micah, was about the abolition of "government". It is sometimes now called
> "anarcho-communism". Unless you can point out to me somewhere in Marx where he
> says that tyrannical dictorships is the goal of communism.

Goal? Even Marx was not that stupid. But to get to the goal, dictatorship was
necessary.   

> [Platt]
> Yes, only Arlo would consider armed political bullies like the KGB to be
> "contextually irrelevant." 
> 
> [Arlo]
> You are just drotting them out in an attempt to shift the rhetoric. I've
> answered this now three times in as many posts. I understand your goal is to
> shift the dialogue away from threatening grounds (state nationalism, the
> obvious ties between Lenin and Strauss in their considering man as too selfish
> or stupid to govern without a strong nationalist myth, and the reality of
> Marx's writings that anyone can pick up and read for themselves). This is the
> insipid, vile talk-radio crap that you always dole out, and it precisely this
> that degenerates any conversation into the same evil stupidity that is always
> had. So cry me a river about being "personally insulted", as if poor Platt the
> innocent is wrongly picked on. 

Forcing Marxism on others at the point of a gun doesn't seem
relevant to Arlo. Instead, it triggers a fusillade of vilification.  

> [Platt]
> See comment about "embarrassing crap" in my reply to Craig's post.
> 
> [Arlo]
> As I said, anyone who has read Marx knows I am correct. Oh you can disagree, 
> to
> be sure, and I do disagree with Marx on many counts. And anyone who has
> actually read him and wants to debate/discuss it, I am game. But this
> talk-radio inspired bile pushes me to my limit. You want to squalk Hannity
> soundbites, go right ahead. Anyone who can pick up a book by Marx and read it
> will see that I am right, and I encourage anyone who might be buying into
> Platt's inspid crap to do so. 
> 
> The only ongoing embarrassment to this forum, Platt, is your disgusting, vile
> and insipid rhetoric. I deal with it too much. Many just ignore it. Ian led
> with the courage to call it out. But its an absolute disgusting thing to have
> to deal with here, and something we should all be ashamed of.

"Bile," "insipid crap," "insipid rhetoric," "disgusting," -- the childish
expletives of self-proclaimed critical thinker. What a model of academic
restraint he is. :-)    


-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to