Arlo asked Platt, > > Let's keep this very concise. Tell me, why > should "gay marriage" be decided upon by "the majority of voters", but > "interracial marriage" be a natural right above "majority voting"? >
The question is, will Platt answer ? Arlo takes huge risks following these arguments through with Platt. People like Micah and Michael get confused and wonder what Arlo's own position is as he chases down Platt's and gets misrepresented by Platt for his troubles. The problem lies here ... > > [Platt] > Well, at least you admit you're no gentleman. Why are we not surprised? > > [Arlo] > No, with you I am not. Who would be surprised? But I think everyone knows that > its only your constant hypocrisy and talk-radio distortions the draw my ire. > "NOT WITH YOU" Platt. I sometimes rise to your mastery of baiting too ... the reality is that the subject of this thread is Platt's morality. I've made the point before that Platt is amoral, which on the subject of morality makes him an immoral, hypocritical, evil distortionist. Platt will call that personal abuse, and probably try to invoke the "ad hominem" technical defense ... but of course Arlo's (and my arguments) with him are far from ad hominem. Platt is the subject of the argument. I sometimes ask myself "why do you bother Arlo ?" And I know the answer. If Platt's hypocrisies were left unchallenged, and not called-out for the garbage they are, his words may stand as representative of this discussion board. What a effin' waste - as Gav pointed out. Ian moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
