Touche, SA :-) ... that's the risk I took. A catch-22. I'd much rather ignore it too, that is of course why I invoked Gav's previous reaction.
Sorry, I didn't mean to come across all put upon - I know others choose to ignore, and regular participants also recognise Platt's game, without advice from the likes of me or Arlo ... though Michael did question Arlo's position ... which is what prompted me to intervene. My point is that so much of this faux argument stands in the record of this board for other unsuspecting new-comers to read, when they stumble upon the idea of researching MoQ. I wouldn't feel the (occasional) need to point this out, if Horse took actions open to him. Anyway - you make an important additional point SA ... what this board needs is a balance of constructive synthetic discussion - building on agreement, and less critical dialectic. Take it away SA :-) Ian On 7/17/07, Heather Perella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [Ian] > > What a effin' waste - as Gav pointed out. > > > Of course Platt's stuck. He's admitted it > before, but gets a high off of this continual > discourse. It's fun. What else is there to do? So > we get stuck with him, feeding into this, but then > again that's how this moqtalk has gotten stuck. We > don't respond and expand upon that which we like and > agree with. We only like to pick out what we don't > like and agree with. When I say "we", I'm talking in > generalities. So we HAVE to keep talking with those > we disagree with. We DON'T talk with those we agree > with and we don't share their ideas and expand upon > them into new ideas. So keep on discussing with those > you disagree with and get frustrated with. You HAVE > to that's the way the Moq.orgdiscuss group is, at > least as long as I've been here for over one year. > So, we all HAVE to conform and socialize with those > that we can't stand and their ideas that annoy us. > It's the way of the land here. You HAVE and MUST do > this. It is your duty. If nobody else does, then who > will. It will all collapse and die without you. > Continue onward and do your duty with all the have's > and must's. We salute you, those that continue to > discuss with each other even though you don't like > what they have to say so you discuss with them - you > really know how this discussion group is. We've got > it all figured out. We MUST and WILL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > hahahahahahaha... > > woods, > SA > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel today! > http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7 > > > moq_discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
