Okay Susan and others...help me understand something. I can't  see basing a 
reading grade on comprehension of a story. Aren't we teaching  a process 
here???We really aren't teaching the story here right? We  are teaching 
students how 
to read...so in the end, isn't what matters most the  strategy knowledge the 
child takes away from your class? Why grade comprehension  of a story when it 
doesn't matter 5 years from now whether or not the child  knows the problem 
and solution of a particular story. There are some children  who could read a 
story and fill in the answers to a comprehension test without  our 
instruction...so how do we know what they have learned without looking at  how 
they have 
come to comprehend or the processes??
 
Problematic as it is, I wonder if the grade has to be on the  processes...not 
the end results which is the comprehension of the  story. A child might not 
have learned a thing from your lessons if  they are good readers and  already 
just "know" or intuit the themes  and are not metacognitively aware of what 
strategies they have used. How are we  moving them forward as readers if we 
don't 
hold them accountable for knowing how  and when to use a strategy?
 
I worry about these bright kids who seem to "get it" so easily. Some day,  
they will be faced with a difficult text that they need to make meaning from. 
We 
 as teachers have to know whether or not we have prepared them to face those  
difficult reading tasks. I have come to firmly believe that the metacognitive 
 part is crucial to all readers in order for them to have flexibility and 
deep  understanding of strategy use.  I know I thought I was a good reader 
until  
I started becoming more aware of strategies and how they are used. As I 
became  metacognitively aware of what I was doing to comprehend, not only did I 
 
understand the strategies better, I understood and enjoyed my own reading much  
more. 
 
I agree with you Susan that comprehension is the goal, but how do we know  
that our students are really learning how to comprehend unless we evaluate 
where 
 they are in their strategies?
 
I have such respect for all of you struggling with this thorny issue and  
grading really comes down to our own personal philosophies of what reading is  
and what needs to be taught. Please understand that my post here is an attempt  
to clarify my own thinking as I struggle with this issue for grades 1-5 at my  
school. It is not an attempt to put down other's grading policies or promote 
my  own views.
Jennifer 
Maryland
 
a message dated 9/16/2006 8:38:11 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

>Last....Do all students need to do all strategies well?

I  thought about this one quite a bit during my teaching years.  I  
concluded that the simple answer is no.  It's more complex, but  
that's the simple answer.

I looked at the strategies I use in  reading, and have used from early 
years.  I rely on some heavily and  others just occasionally/lightly. 
I use some in all kinds of reading, and  others only in technical 
reading, as an example.

My goal would be  to have all students understand all the strategies. 
However, they, too,  are going to have strategies on which they rely 
more than others.   They don't need the same level of excellence in 
all.

The goal of  our comprehension instruction is always just that - 
comprehension.   The strategies outlined by Keene and Zimmerman are 
the best summary of  what needs to be known that I came across. 
There's always more work to be  done in this area, of course, and I 
know they are continuing to do  it.  However, we have to remember that 
while teaching the strategies  is important, understanding the 
strategies is important, comprehension is  still the goal.

I've had students who seemed to "intuit"  meaning.  I'm sure that on 
some level they were using the strategies,  or some form of them. 
They couldn't explain how they knew some things, but  they were 
adamant about knowing them, and they were almost always on  target.  I 
didn't get caught up in worrying about whether they  understood the 
strategies, or how well they understood them.  I  focused on how well 
they comprehended a given text, instead.  That  would rule out grading 
the use of strategies,  definitely.




_______________________________________________
Mosaic mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to 
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Reply via email to