Cathy,

I agree, we need to help each other out as much as possible with RtI.  Having 
just adopted the DRA2 for grades K05 (K-3 previously used the old version), our 
primary issue right out of the gate is fluency, and more specifically rate. I 
just met with our Exceptional Education director yesterday and we are concerned 
that RtI may force us to bring back DIBLES, which I helped put to rest last 
year.  One of our schools has purchased the new Fountas and Pinnell 
calculators, making it posible to easily caculate a rate score with every 
running record.  I suggested that we consider asking for a weekly running 
record for 'progress monitoring', rather than use the DIBLES.  Our teachers are 
already doing running records, so it looks like a way to naturally incorporate 
this rather unnatural process of timing.   We are going to see if this will fly.

A second issue of concern is related to phonemic awareness.  I think a wider 
review of the research (including what was knowingly excluded by the NRP) 
suggests a chicken and the egg conversation--which comes first, what is a 
bi-product of what.  I want to avoid having to use DIBELS and those darned 
nonsense words if possible.  Cathy, and others, how are you planning to address 
this concern?

Lori


----- Original message -----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [email protected]
Date: 2008, 15, Friday Of February 15:01
Subject: Re: [MOSAIC] rti conversation

> 
> We are dealing with the same situation in experimenting with RtI this year, 
> before it is required next year. It will be tough to find a comprehension 
> assessment that we can do quickly enough to use for progress monitoring. Our 
> older students are all over the map with the retell. Many of the very 
> competent students summarize, which is a higher level skill, rather than 
> retell. So their dibels scores look bad, but they can comprehend just fine. 
> Since we will all be in the same boat very soon, we should all collaborate on 
> the development of a comprehension assessment that deals with strategies. We 
> are actually experimenting with the ones form Keene's assessment book. 
> 
> 
> 
> Cathy 
> 
> DE
> 
> K-5
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: STEWART, L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Mosaic: A Reading Comprehension Strategies Email Group 
> <[email protected]>
> Sent: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:48 am
> Subject: Re: [MOSAIC] rti conversation
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks for this message.  You just gave me my aha moment.  We moved to
> DRA2 testing this year.  Our initial testing put the majority of our
> kids below grade level, because we had not been teaching retell.  We
> were teaching summarizing (which I still believe is the better skill to
> teach).  Now that we are teaching retell the children are passing the
> DRA2 with flying colors.  However, when we ask them to respond to text
> we are able to clearly see that they are not necessarily comprehending
> anything beyond a literal interpretation.  When are we going to get
> these things right!
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 9:18 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [MOSAIC] rti conversation
> 
> Our district is implementing the tiering for rti as well as  thinking
> about who needs more intensive instruction, but so far we have not had
> any mandated progress monitoring methods. We check back after an IST-
> Instructional support team- meeting, usually about 6-8 weeks, and see if
> the  issues with the child have been resolved. Our problem with DIBELS
> is that it  really doesn't seem to address comprehension issues for
> older kids. If the  student can retell what they've read and use the
> words from the story they get  credit. Yet, isn't that just assessing
> working memory, not comprehension? They  only get 1 minute to talk about
> the story. So, we really don't have a good  progress assessment that can
> be used weekly or biweekly like we should for tier  3 kids. Does anyone
> else have these issues?
> Michelle- NY AIS 2-5 reading
> 
> 
> 
> **************The year's hottest artists on the red carpet at the Grammy
> 
> Awards. Go to AOL Music.      
> (http://music.aol.com/grammys?NCID=aolcmp00300000002565)
> _______________________________________________
> Mosaic mailing list
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
> http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.
> 
> Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive. 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mosaic mailing list
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
> http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.
> 
> Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive. 
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________________________________________________
> More new features than ever.  Check out the new AOL Mail ! - 
> http://webmail.aol.com
> _______________________________________________
> Mosaic mailing list
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
> http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.
> 
> Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive. 
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
Mosaic mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive. 

Reply via email to