I am wondering--and this is a genuine wonder--how would you like to be the only 
kid, or a kid among a minority, that the teacher listens to?  Wouldn't that 
seem to message inadequacy to a reader? I am not sure that I don't think this 
is an all or nothing conversation.

Lori


----- Original message -----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [email protected]
Date: 2008, 09, Sunday Of March 21:16
Subject: Re: [MOSAIC] middle school reading assessment.

> I just think that this is a daunting task for ms teachers with the numbers  
> of students they teach.  I agree that with some kids teachers should be  sure 
> to hear them read to listen for the miscues.  BUT, I cannot accept  that this 
> type of assessment is necessary for all.  Talking to some  students after 
> looking at their written responses should suffice.
>  
> Leslie
>  
>  
> In a message dated 3/9/2008 10:11:10 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 
> Leslie  and all, I am also turning this over and over again in my  mind and I 
>  have decided that a "running record" is definitely of value. The issue for 
> us  has been what text to use beyond Z. And, how to develop teachers into 
> skilled  assessors of retellings and other critical elements in order to 
> really get 
> a  sense of the reader and that reader's progress over time. Acuity, the 
> periodic  assessment of McGraw hill, has recently posted high school -level 
> by 
> grade  passages and I plan to use some of those in the "running records." I 
> also  
> think it's important to discern a running record that was done with a  
> fictional work or a non fiction piece. Perhaps the challenges of non fiction  
> in 
> terms of non considerate text, an invisible author, and academic vocabulary  
> is 
> worthy of consideration in the middle school classroom. Uh, that may mean  
> that 
> content area teachers should do a "running record" with their students  and 
> the text books they are reading..
> 
> Maureen Robins
> Assistant  Principal
> JHS 194
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sun  3/9/2008 9:56 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [MOSAIC]  middle school reading assessment.
> 
> 
> 
> Do you think, at the middle  school level, that it is necessary to do a 
> "running record"?  When  our admin asks for reading levels every 6 weeks or  
> so, the
> middle  school teacher get their backs up.  My feeling is that at  the  higher
> (R and up, I'm talking Fountas and Pinnell here) readers can read  a  passage
> silently and then write a written retelling, followed by  some  strategy-based
> questions.  With upwards of 100 students, it  is a huge task  to do a running
> record with each child and I don't  really think it is necessary  for every
> child...maybe just he  strugglers.
> 
> Leslie
> 
> 
> In a message dated 3/9/2008 2:36:41 P.M.  Eastern Daylight Time, 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 
> You   sound like you need a miscue analysis sort of assessment.  The   
> Goodman's
> are the ones to look at, but there are ooodles of folks that  have  written
> books about it.  Google it.   It is a  lengthy  test.  But you don't use it
> with everyone.  You use  it with the  kids that you know are struggling, but
> are unsure  why.
> 
> I have found  it irreplaceable when I want to know EXACTLY  what a student is
> doing when  they read.  No IRI or bubble test  will tell me this.  I  know
> there are folks against it.  But  once I know where a kid is  truly
> struggling, I can send them to the  strategy to help fix it.   THAT is what
> will show up on your  numbers test.
> 
> Good teaching is  what will raise test  scores...
> Kim
> 
> On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 11:09 AM,  gina nunley  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> 
> > I have to  chime in  and agree about the need for multi-assessments.  I have
> >  had  students who scored high on the SRI  (scholastic reading inventory),  
> low
> > on the state test, and middle of the road on QRI.    I  use a spread sheet
> > that has all the data side by side so I can  surmise  who really needs a
> > closer looking at.
> >
> > In  regards to  Lori's plea for continuing discussion about middle  level
> > reading  assessment I would be thrilled to do  that.
> >
> > Moderators-   Do we need to do this off this  site?
> >
> > Our campus is trying to  create an RtI model and of  course progress
> > monitoring is the hurdle  for us.  QRI,  STAR, SRI are all just to identify
> > reading  levels....they don't  give short term "assessment for learning"
> >   information.
> >
> > You know I am on this list because I am a   believer in MOT and strategy
> > work.  But I have to be  honest...my  attempt at using Ellin's strategy
> > interview  bombed.  I just  couldn't squeeze it in, and then I had  trouble
> > using it in a way that  I could bring to campus  meetings.
> >
> >
> > What I think is at  the core of the  progress monitoring dilemma is coming
> > to agreement on  what you  want to assess in reading.  That then tells you 
> of
> >  course  what you will be assessing on a frequent basis.  I have to speak  
> the
> > language of the campus committee but I am trying to avoid  target  goals 
> like
> > will build vocabulary....who decides  that  list?
> >
> > I'll stop before I babble.  Again I'd  like to have  this ongoing
> > conversation.  Should we find  another place to do  it?
> >
> >
> >
> >   _________________________________________________________________
> >   Connect and share in new ways with Windows Live.
> >
> >   
> http://www.windowslive.com/share.html?ocid=TXT_TAGHM_Wave2_sharelife_012008
> >   _______________________________________________
> > Mosaic mailing   list
> > [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe or modify  your  membership please go to
> >   http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.
> >
> >   Search the MOSAIC archives at   http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.
> >
> >
> 
> 
> --  
> Kim
> -------
> Kimberlee Hannan
> Department Chair,  ELA
> Sequoia  Middle School
> Fresno, California 93702
> 
> The best  teachers teach from  the heart, not from the book.  ~Author   
> Unknown
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> _______________________________________________
> Mosaic   mailing list
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe or modify  your  membership please go   to
> http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.
> 
> Search   the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> **************It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms, and  advice on AOL Money &
> Finance.       (http://money.aol.com/tax?NCID=aolprf00030000000001)
> _______________________________________________
> Mosaic  mailing list
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe or modify your  membership please go  to
> http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.
> 
> Search  the MOSAIC archives at  http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mosaic  mailing list
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe or modify your  membership please go  to
> http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.
> 
> Search  the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> **************It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms, and advice on AOL Money & 
> Finance.      (http://money.aol.com/tax?NCID=aolprf00030000000001)
> _______________________________________________
> Mosaic mailing list
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
> http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.
> 
> Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive. 
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
Mosaic mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive. 

Reply via email to