This so so touched my heart.  You are wonderful and teach us all.  Thank you
for sharing this.  I will share it on....

Sally


On 1/15/12 5:47 PM, "Sharon Ballantyne" <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> Hello all,
> 
> I have been very pleased to have the listening component so positively
> reinforced, largely thanks to the influence of daily five practices. as
> pointed out by another teacher, the children do respond positively. I provide
> lots of opportunities for listening as part of daily five, read-a-louds and
> the growing expanses of audio formats as well as formats that support
> highlighting of words as they are read as found in meegenius app for iDevices.
> 
> I use audio personally all the time with most of my curriculum being in audio
> which I listen to while reading it to students. I am unable to read print due
> to being totally blind. While I use Braille daily as an organizational tool to
> help sort my files, student books, classroom library and such, it is far too
> cumbersome and time consuming  for me personally to read lengthy texts. . If
> one has grown up using Braille it may be a different response entirely.
> Accessibility in Braille is also very costly and in this age of technology
> very limiting for the things I personally need.
> 
> My grade three class would never consider that I am not reading as I share
> what I read through listening. When students can pair print text to follow
> along it also really enriches their learning for fluency as mentioned, but
> also to hear all the nuances of speech and tone through different speakers.
> Some of the narrators on the audible library are quite talented. I listen to
> audio formats of children's picture books, novels, textbooks while
> simulreading these to my students. I listen to text and teach with it in much
> the same way you do with a piece of print in front of you.
> 
> I do my duty supervision in a kindergarten class four times a week while the
> teacher takes her break and as my guide dog and I enter it is not unusual for
> a child to announce "Mrs. B is here to read to us." .
> 
> I believe the audio format can supplement, extend and where needed replace
> print decoding as the only form of reading. Listening as reading promotes a
> love of reading, enjoyment and widens horizons to appreciate literature.
> 
> Historically there has been an argument that people reading by audio are not
> reading. Our students with LD who might use scanning technology such as
> kerzweil have been challenged as this not being literacy in my own school
> board.
> 
> It is not as easy to research using audio but it can be done. My kindle allows
> me instant access to a world of books I would not otherwise had access too.
> Scanning of print texts to be in a digitally accessible format I can now do as
> quickly  as quickly as I can physically turn a print page. Using digital
> camera technology which has replaced the flatbed scanner technology, I have my
> camera configured to detect hand motion of turning the page and an audible
> camera click alerts me the page has been scanned. With my software program set
> to read while scanning I can "read" (by listening to the speech synthesizer of
> my computer),  while I scan print pages. The quality is still questionable at
> times but if anyone had told me even a few years ago that I as a totally blind
> person would successfully be working with a digital camera to scan documents
> and make them accessible I would have thought it quite beyond my imagination.
> 
> E-readers are a wonderful technology. Some people do not even realize
> e-readers often have full speech possibilities to read the text if the book
> has text to speech enabled. Many users I know have opted to combine reading
> the text visually and switching to audio to support reading when tired or
> commuting.
> 
> It kind of begs the question... what is reading?
> 
> Does reading beyond the "cult of normalcy" expectations mean it is not reading
> just because it is different from the way people usually interact with text?
> 
> As I defend my phD dissertation(unrelated to this topic)  in a few months, the
> reality is that five years of research have been accomplished using listening
> to reading. It is a process of drawing the circle wider and accepting that
> print impairments in the twenty-first century do not mean an inaccessibility
> to the world of reading and literacy.
> 
> If I can provide any support to any teachers who might be struggling to get
> their head around the making space of accepting this as reading, please do
> feel free to contact me off-list.
> 
> Sharon
> [email protected]
> On 2012-01-15, at 6:29 PM, Troy F wrote:
> 
>> There should be some research backing it up in the daily five book or in its
>> bibliography.
>> 
>> Troy Fredde
>> 
>> On Jan 15, 2012, at 9:44 AM, Kathy <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> It's a form of modeling for fluency.  Kids enjoy listening centers and if
>>> they pick up one word, that's one more word added to their vocabulary and
>>> reading words. 
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>> On Jan 14, 2012, at 7:03 PM, Sally Thomas <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Seems like all the benefits of "read alouds" would accrue.  I use a handout
>>>> summarizing those benefits.  They include building vocabulary, building
>>>> knowledge of syntax (especially for hearing the syntax of written
>>>> language),
>>>> comprehension etc.  No they are not figuring out unknown words as far as
>>>> decoding goes.  But there are lots of benefits.  I don't know specific
>>>> research but sure it's there.  It's one of those common sense notions.  Bet
>>>> Krashen has some research to support it.  Try him.
>>>> 
>>>> Sally
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 1/14/12 1:52 PM, "evelia cadet" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Is anyone aware of research supporting listening to books?  I know is one
>>>>> of
>>>>> the five components of the Daily 5.  My students have been listening to
>>>>> books
>>>>> online and they are obsessed about it.  I am glad that they are enjoying
>>>>> this
>>>>> activity, however, I don't have sufficient information on how it benefits
>>>>> their reading.  I would love to hear your research, ideas or opinions.
>>>>> Thank
>>>>> you. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Mosaic mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
>>>>> http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org
>>>>> 
>>>>> Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Mosaic mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
>>>> http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org
>>>> 
>>>> Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mosaic mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
>>> http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org
>>> 
>>> Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mosaic mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
>> http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org
>> 
>> Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mosaic mailing list
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
> http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org
> 
> Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive
> 



_______________________________________________
Mosaic mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive

Reply via email to