I think your remark in the mail from January was correct, it has to be
        ePos-sPos+1 > backoff
but currently still is 
        ePos-sPos+1 <= backoff

Are you able to somehow test this?


On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 23:57 +0400, Hieu Hoang wrote:
> ah yes, I thought the backoff was doing the opposite to what it's 
> supposed to do so I changed the comparison around. I checked that it 
> backed off, but i didn't run it through tuning.
> 
> it may still be wrong, or there may be strange interaction with the tuning.
> 
> 
> On 16/04/2015 22:16, Matthias Huck wrote:
> > Well, what's that business mentioned in your mail from January (quoted
> > below), with the backoff being broken, then being broken more, then
> > possibly been fixed - or not?
> >
> > https://github.com/moses-smt/mosesdecoder/commit/44fec57c535db2df73ccbb1628d8143a9c728c19
> >
> >
> > I set up a system that was supposed to do backoff with factored
> > generation steps, more or less in the manner of what's described in this
> > paper: Interpolated Backoff for Factored Translation Models, Philipp
> > Koehn and Barry Haddow, AMTA 2012.
> >
> > MIRA tunes all the weights of the backoff models to 0. With exactly the
> > same configuration, this did not happen last year (February 2014). Maybe
> > the [decoding-graph-backoff] setting didn't have any effect prior to
> > some of your code modifications, and the models were actually competing
> > in older setups? Or it's buggy now. I can't really tell.
> >
> > I can show you the two setups if you want.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 21:34 +0400, Hieu Hoang wrote:
> >> Didn't know it has changed. How should it behave and how does it
> >> actually behave?
> >>
> >> On 16 Apr 2015 21:04, "Matthias Huck" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>          Hi Hieu,
> >>          
> >>          It seems that [decoding-graph-backoff] doesn't quite behave
> >>          like last
> >>          year any more. Can you briefly explain how its behaviour has
> >>          changed,
> >>          i.e. what it did before and what it does now? Can you please
> >>          also let me
> >>          know whether there's a way to reproduce the old behaviour via
> >>          configuration options?
> >>          
> >>          Cheers,
> >>          Matthias
> >>          
> >>          
> >>          
> >>          On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 15:20 +0000, Hieu Hoang wrote:
> >>          > >From the git history, I think it was slightly broken, then
> >>          I broke it even
> >>          > more in May 2014.
> >>          >
> >>          >
> >>          
> >> https://github.com/moses-smt/mosesdecoder/commit/44fec57c535db2df73ccbb1628d8143a9c728c19
> >>          >
> >>          > It was
> >>          >    endPos-startPos+1 >= backoff
> >>          > then
> >>          >   endPos-startPos+1 <= backoff
> >>          > I think it should be
> >>          >   endPos-startPos+1 > backoff
> >>          >
> >>          > I'll change it if it's ok with everyone
> >>          >
> >>          >
> >>          > On 9 January 2015 at 15:11, Marcin Junczys-Dowmunt
> >>          <[email protected]>
> >>          > wrote:
> >>          >
> >>          > >  Hm, we have been using it at WIPO, but I have to admit I
> >>          never checked
> >>          > > it _actually_ does anything useful. We sorta believe it
> >>          does.
> >>          > >
> >>          > > W dniu 09.01.2015 o 16:08, Hieu Hoang pisze:
> >>          > >
> >>          > >   Hi All
> >>          > >
> >>          > >  Does anyone use this functionality in Moses when you have
> >>          multiple
> >>          > > phrase-tables?
> >>          > >
> >>          > >  From the code, it doesn't look like it works as described
> >>          in
> >>          > >   http://www.statmt.org/moses/?n=Moses.AdvancedFeatures
> >>          > >
> >>          > >  Maybe I'm missing something
> >>          > >
> >>          > > --
> >>          > > Hieu Hoang
> >>          > > Research Associate
> >>          > > University of Edinburgh
> >>          > > http://www.hoang.co.uk/hieu
> >>          > >
> >>          > >
> >>          > >
> >>          > > _______________________________________________
> >>          > > Moses-support mailing
> >>          
> >> [email protected]http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
> >>          > >
> >>          > >
> >>          > >
> >>          > > _______________________________________________
> >>          > > Moses-support mailing list
> >>          > > [email protected]
> >>          > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
> >>          > >
> >>          > >
> >>          >
> >>          >
> >>          > _______________________________________________
> >>          > Moses-support mailing list
> >>          > [email protected]
> >>          > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
> >>          > The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered
> >>          in
> >>          > Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
> >>          
> >>          
> >>          
> >>          --
> >>          The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered
> >>          in
> >>          Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
> >>          
> >>          
> >
> >
> 



-- 
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.

_______________________________________________
Moses-support mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support

Reply via email to