ah, it looks like there was an error with compact pt's word alignment output.
I believe that would have been fixed pdq. Hieu Hoang http://www.hoang.co.uk/hieu On 24 August 2016 at 13:56, Mike Ladwig <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm not using mosesserver yet, just moses. > > One previous report was here: > > https://www.mail-archive.com/moses-support%40mit.edu/msg12355.html > > But I'm not sure if this was with moses 2 or 3. There was a later report > from Tom Hoar with similar information. > > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 8:52 AM, Hieu Hoang <[email protected]> wrote: > >> the placeholders shouldn't be dependent on the pt implementation. >> >> I don't know about mosesserver though >> >> Hieu Hoang >> http://www.hoang.co.uk/hieu >> >> On 24 August 2016 at 13:47, Mike Ladwig <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Training appears to work with passing "-placeholder-factor 1 -xml-input >>> exclusive" to mert-moses and I get the expected results throughout the >>> tuning process. >>> >>> Unfortunately, it appears that the compact phrase table implementation >>> (reordering is fine) is not compatible with placeholders. I found some >>> inconclusive discussion of the issue about a year ago. >>> >>> I am working with the 2.1.1 release, and will investigate the 3.x >>> release -- does anyone have any information or experience using >>> placeholders, the compact phrase tables, and mosesserver (another sometimes >>> problematic element) together? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> mike. >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 6:04 AM, Matthias Huck <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> In the EMS configuration file, you can specify >>>> >>>> decoder-settings = "..." >>>> >>>> under both [TUNING] and [EVALUATION]. Maybe that's all you need? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Matthias >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, 2016-08-23 at 00:40 +0100, Hieu Hoang wrote: >>>> > no really sure what you mean. Shouldn't have to dig around mert >>>> > -moses.pl. >>>> > >>>> > It's fairly straightforward but I would say that placeholders is only >>>> > used >>>> > by some people. If you find a suspected bug, report it or try & fix >>>> > it >>>> > yourself >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > Hieu Hoang >>>> > http://www.hoang.co.uk/hieu >>>> > >>>> > On 23 August 2016 at 00:22, Mike Ladwig <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > > Hi Hieu! >>>> > > >>>> > > Thanks for the reply. >>>> > > >>>> > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Hieu Hoang <[email protected]> >>>> > > wrote: >>>> > > >>>> > > > hi mike >>>> > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > 1. If I add "-placeholder-factor 1 -xml-input exclusive" to the >>>> > > > > --decoder-flags parameter of mert-moses.pl, will that single >>>> > > > > addition >>>> > > > > extend into both places mentioned in the EMS section? >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > No, if you want to use placeholders in tuning and during testing, >>>> > > > you >>>> > > > need to putting in both places. mert-moses.pl only does tuning >>>> > > > >>>> > > >>>> > > I think I am confused because there are two [EVALUATION] sectons on >>>> > > the >>>> > > page. The first is in section 3 (Tuning) and the second is in >>>> > > section 4 >>>> > > (Evaluation). >>>> > > >>>> > > Is the section 3 Evaluation block an error, or do I need to go into >>>> > > the >>>> > > guts of mert-moses.pl to add flags to the decoder code invoked >>>> > > inside >>>> > > mert-moses.pl? >>>> > > >>>> > > mike. >>>> > > >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > Moses-support mailing list >>>> > [email protected] >>>> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moses-support mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support >>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ Moses-support mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
