> I thought about xul because development is XML-based. No compilation. > Plus, what someone will see with Windows, it will be the same with Linux > and MacOSX. Xul applications are light weight and rely on web standards > like RDF and CSS. Another reason is that I have (very crazy) ideas about > remote development that xul seems able to let me try. The most obvious choice for an IDE for Oz, is Oz. Did you consider using the QTk library?
-- http://www.fastmail.fm - A no graphics, no pop-ups email service _________________________________________________________________________________ mozart-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.mozart-oz.org/mailman/listinfo/mozart-users
