> No, I don't. I think committees and meetings effectively close off the
It's not a committee, and it's not a meeting. It's a team, and it's open
to anyone. It's merely a method of getting focus.
One of the possible disadvantages of the way open source works is that
it's easy to be all talk and no action. The point is that this will be a
way of pushing things forward.
> Hold discussions in the relevant groups, just as you did with the
> mozilla.* reorganization -- discussions which are moderated (in the
> debate sense, not in the Usenet sense) by the person who is actually
> going to make the changes.
I've already said why [EMAIL PROTECTED] didn't think newsgroups were
appropriate, particularly for long-term stuff. Aaron should appear with
the URL for the web forum any time now (he says, hopefully.)
> If you must have committees, put me down for either or both of them (if
> only one, then the long-term one). But I'd rather you didn't have them
> at all.
It's not a case of "putting you down", so much as a case of you saying
you'll do it. Anyway, great :-)
Gerv
