Matthew Thomas wrote:
<snip>
> Now that I'm already involved in QA and know what I'm doing, I never
>
> look at the QA pages at all.
This is a shortcoming of the QA documentation, not, I think, an intended
result. Ultimately I think the QA and Testing pages should be focused
on qa and testing -- test suites, specifications, quality measurement
and tracking, etc. However, I think that much of what belongs in this
section _will_ have a "how to" feel like "how to run this testcase"
which may be less useful to those already familiar with that particular
area or test. There may also be pages that have "how to get involved
-beginner/intermediate/advanced" which point to content (specs and
testcases or other activities like triage or quality tracking) within
the differnet QA Groups. Maybe this second class of documents (a couple
docs might suffice) belongs in a "getting involved" section.
-Asa
