Zach Lipton wrote:
> Why does it need to be html 4.01? I used XHTML because that is the current
> standard. If there are more validation issues, or if it would be better in
> XHTML strict, I can do that, but I am not sure why we have to.
It doesn't need to be HTML 4.01 Strict. I just usually code to HTML 4.01 Strict.
Here, I changed the doctype:
http://fantasai.tripod.com/Mozilla/2000/reorg.html.txt
http://fantasai.tripod.com/Mozilla/2000/stt.html.txt
http://fantasai.tripod.com/Mozilla/2000/ltt.html.txt
Anything else?
