Henri Sivonen wrote:
>...
> I don't think we should set an example by serving XHTML as text/html.
> In that case the browser doesn't enforce well-formedness. I don't
> think we want the risk of accidentally ending up with non-well-formed
> sorta-XHTML legacy to deal with."
>...

Given that non-well-formedness is what the Web thrives on, and it would
be very easy to fix errors in the pages after their initial publication,
what exactly would be wrong with that?

-- 
Matthew `mpt' Thomas, Mozilla user interface QA

Reply via email to