In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Zach Lipton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why does it need to be html 4.01? I used XHTML because that is the current
> standard.
Copy-pasting from an older message of mine:
"I think serving XHTML to Mozilla as text/html makes no sense unless you
are using a tool that only outputs XHTML. (This is not the case with
Editor or text editor.) XHTML served to Mozilla as text/html offers no
benefit over HTML 4.01. The benefits come when XHTML is served as
text/xml and combined with other applications of XML.
I don't think we should set an example by serving XHTML as text/html. In
that case the browser doesn't enforce well-formedness. I don't think we
want the risk of accidentally ending up with non-well-formed sorta-XHTML
legacy to deal with."
--
Henri Sivonen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clinet.fi/~henris/
