Gervase Markham wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>> Well on the subject of Databases V Static files: Since the files on
>> mozilla.org are going to be changed quite infrequently,
>
>That's a sweeping generalisation that doesn't hold up. And, if
>documentation changes infrequently, there's all the more need to have a
>DB-driven comments system, so people can correct glaring deficiencies
>simply and easily.
>
>What we have currently is a static, infrequently-changing, non DB-driven,
>non-interactive site - and it sucks. For lots of reasons other than the
>above ones, but those are some of them.
Point taken. I think your right.
--
psr
->8O)
[from address in headers munged, reply to address should be ok]
