I agree with the idea of CSS-ification of mozilla.org... It's current
table-hell layout isn't very representative of what one of the things
the Mozilla browser is about (adhering to standards).
One thing though, as a suggestion, is some fancy (compliant) DHTML
stuff. That is what impresses people, web developers for example, that
kind of interactivity. For example, look at http://msdn.microsoft.com/.
A lot of DHTML is used in a mostly usable and functional way.
fantasai wrote:
>
> Agree? Disagree? Got something to add (probably)? Can't
> stand my text? Write something; you can't slash at a pen
> name with a knife. (You could bash me over the head with
> a dictionary, though.)
>
