Samat Jain wrote:
> I agree with the idea of CSS-ification of mozilla.org... It's current
> table-hell layout isn't very representative of what one of the things
> the Mozilla browser is about (adhering to standards).
>
> One thing though, as a suggestion, is some fancy (compliant) DHTML
> stuff. That is what impresses people, web developers for example, that
> kind of interactivity. For example, look at http://msdn.microsoft.com/.
> A lot of DHTML is used in a mostly usable and functional way.
>
Unfortunately writing "DHTML" (I hate this word) stuff in a
cross-browser way is nearly impossible. I tried to do something on the
DOM part of mozilla.org that was actually useful, it worked in Mozilla
IE and Konqueror but unfortunately not in NS4 and Opera, and I fear
there will always be a problem with such scripts : it will never be
totally good in all browsers. Admittedly, CSS also will look in some
browsers, but to a lesser extent than DOM. I think the DHTML should be
left for DOM samples and demos of other stuff, but not for usual
content, that could render the content of the site inaccessible to
people without javascript enabled, for example.
-Fabian.
> fantasai wrote:
>
>>
>> Agree? Disagree? Got something to add (probably)? Can't
>> stand my text? Write something; you can't slash at a pen
>> name with a knife. (You could bash me over the head with
>> a dictionary, though.)
>>
>
>
