> > And then where would we discuss mozilla.org policies in general? In > > mozilla.general? > > The description of .mozilla-org just looks restrictive. I think there > is an implied phrase "mozilla.org issues such as but not limited to" > lurking in the desciption. > > Discussion about policies would also go into .mozilla-org rather than > .general. Note: The current version has no group .mozilla-org. It went back to mozilla.dev.general... Gerv
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Gervase Markham
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming jesus X
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Gervase Markham
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming jesus X
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Gervase Markham
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming jesus X
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Henri Sivonen
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Henri Sivonen
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Henri Sivonen
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Gervase Markham
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Henri Sivonen
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Gervase Markham
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Ben Bucksch
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Henri Sivonen
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Gervase Markham
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Ben Bucksch
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Simon P. Lucy
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Ben Bucksch
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Henri Sivonen
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Ben Bucksch
