In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rats... I can't find the message now. Someone convinced me that the title > wasn't general enough. I remember you said that calling it > mozilla.dev.general would attract too many general questions; there is a > mozilla.general for precisely this purpose - it will most definitely be an > optional subscribe for everyone. > > Why else should it be called .dev.mozilla-org? No other reason--just separating the organizational discussion from other discussion. > Or are you suggesting we have that as well as a .dev.general? I think that would be OK. -- Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.clinet.fi/~henris/
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Gervase Markham
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming jesus X
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Henri Sivonen
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Henri Sivonen
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Henri Sivonen
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Gervase Markham
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Henri Sivonen
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Gervase Markham
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Ben Bucksch
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Henri Sivonen
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Gervase Markham
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Ben Bucksch
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Simon P. Lucy
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Ben Bucksch
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Henri Sivonen
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Ben Bucksch
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Simon P. Lucy
- mozilla.org for users? Ben Bucksch
- Re: mozilla.org for users? Stephen Moehle
