In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Gervase Markham 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Rats... I can't find the message now. Someone convinced me that the title
> wasn't general enough. I remember you said that calling it
> mozilla.dev.general would attract too many general questions; there is a
> mozilla.general for precisely this purpose - it will most definitely be an
> optional subscribe for everyone.
> 
> Why else should it be called .dev.mozilla-org?

No other reason--just separating the organizational discussion from 
other discussion.

> Or are you suggesting we have that as well as a .dev.general?

I think that would be OK.

-- 
Henri Sivonen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clinet.fi/~henris/

Reply via email to