> One person on .java *did* express discontent with the decision to > discontinue the group. So they didn't read the message, which specifically requests follow-ups to n.p.m.general, then? :-) I heard nothing of this. > However, if .java is dead and gone, I'll respect the decision. The question is: will there really be enough non-OJI java discussions, and will the number of people who are interested in them be sufficiently different from those in oji, to warrant a new group? (There's also the thing that any group called .java attracts off-topic questions.) Gerv
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming: Update Ben Bucksch
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming: Update Mark Anderson
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming: Update Gervase Markham
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming: Update Mark Anderson
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming: Update Gervase Markham
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming: Update Mark Anderson
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming: Update Braden McDaniel
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming: Update Braden McDaniel
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming: Update Gervase Markham
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming: Update Braden McDaniel
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming: Update Daniel Veditz
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming: Update Gervase Markham
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming: Update Simon P. Lucy
