Re: Newsgroup Renaming: Update

[Braden McDaniel]

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Mark Anderson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Well, one could make the same argument that there won't be enough OJI
> questions, since the interfaces are more or less frozen for that now.
> :)

And they're all perfectly documented and bug-free, too. ;-)

> Actually, if there were some way to convey other non-OJI problems as
> on-topic in an .oji group (Perhaps a name of .oji-jre or something
> sufficiently obscure to keep out general Java off-topic questions but
> make on-topic stuff appropriate?), that might be ideal.

Here's the part I'm not getting: Since all Java in Mozilla talks to
Mozilla via OJI, how can a Java devlopment issue not be OJI-related and still be
topical to Mozilla?

Braden