> We did have a discussion on this issue in this group, and the reasons for > the decision can be found there :-) I know. I was there. :) But in .general you're highly unlikely to find many who'd give a rat's posterior about a .java group. I'd guess that half of the users in this particular group probably don't even enable Java. :)
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming: Update Ben Bucksch
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming: Update Mark Anderson
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming: Update Gervase Markham
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming: Update Mark Anderson
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming: Update Gervase Markham
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming: Update Mark Anderson
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming: Update Braden McDaniel
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming: Update Braden McDaniel
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming: Update Gervase Markham
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming: Update Braden McDaniel
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming: Update Daniel Veditz
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming: Update Gervase Markham
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming: Update Simon P. Lucy
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming: Update Gervase Markham
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming: Update Simon P. Lucy
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming: Update Ben Bucksch
