In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Mark Anderson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And I'm going to suggest that perhaps we shouldn't get rid of .java
> after all. I can think of situations where it would be decidedly
> on-topic to have Java discussion that doesn't touch OJI (for example,
> applet lifecycle discussions really make no sense in .oji, but they make
> perfect sense in
> .java).
I don't know why applet lifecycle issues unique to Mozilla wouldn't be
topical in .oji. OTOH, if you're talking about generic applet lifecycle
issues, mozilla.* is the wrong hierarchy altogether.
> One person on .java *did* express discontent with the decision to
> discontinue the group. Admittedly, not a majority, but lots of other
> changes were made to the hierarchy at the suggestion of individuals.
There's more than democracy going on here. Largely it comes down to
making a convincing case to the PTB.
Braden
