In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ben Bucksch) wrote: > Matthew Thomas wrote: > >> The only alternative I see is > >> to completely change the policy of mozilla.org. > > > > Balderdash. People other than developers and testers are going to use > > mozilla.org's Mozilla builds for Web browsing, e-mail etc, regardless > > of whether or not mozilla.org sanctions such use. > > Not if there are no builds at all. Are you seriously suggesting that mozilla.org withdraw binaries? Then the newsgroups would be filled with people asking where the builds are. -- Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.clinet.fi/~henris/
- Re: mozilla.org for users? Gervase Markham
- Re: mozilla.org for users? Simon P. Lucy
- Re: mozilla.org for users? fantasai
- Re: mozilla.org for users? Ben Bucksch
- Re: mozilla.org for users? Gervase Markham
- Re: mozilla.org for users? Andreas Franke
- Re: mozilla.org for users? Gervase Markham
- Re: mozilla.org for users? Ben Bucksch
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Matthew Thomas
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Ben Bucksch
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Henri Sivonen
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Ben Bucksch
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Henri Sivonen
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Ben Bucksch
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Andreas Franke
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Gervase Markham
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Andreas Franke
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Ben Bucksch
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Gervase Markham
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Ben Bucksch
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Andreas Franke
