Stephen Moehle wrote: <snip> > At the same time, no one wants to rewrite > everything because someone decided to change the rules, which is why > backwards compatibility is good. > > Stephen Moehle What seems to be missing from this thread is someone willing to implement these features. We'd all love to have every feature under the sun (and a pref for every one of them) but features don't just materialize out of thin air. --Asa
- Re: layers Steve Morrison
- Re: layers Gervase Markham
- Re: layers Jerry Baker
- Re: layers Daniel Veditz
- Re: layers Mark Bitterling
- Re: layers Braden McDaniel
- Re: layers Mark Bitterling
- Re: layers Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.
- Re: layers Steve Chapel
- Re: layers Stephen Moehle
- Re: layers Asa Dotzler
- Re: layers Stephen Moehle
- Re: layers Asa Dotzler
- Re: layers Matthew Thomas
- Re: layers Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.
- Re: layers Gervase Markham
- Re: layers Braden McDaniel
- Re: layers Christopher Jahn
- Re: layers Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.
- Re: layers Mark Anderson
- Re: layers Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.
