Re: Link problem

[Gervase Markham]

> The average consumer (and me too) will say it works with NS4.76 or IE5
> but not with Mozilla, and therefore Mozilla is broke. For perfectly good
> evidence of this, take a look at the bug page at how many times this has
> been resubmitted. It is the largest number I have so far stumbled across
> (though I have not looked at a lot).

There's a bigger issue here. Who do we respect more? Old and broken
browsers, or W3C and other internet standards (such as RFCs)? If we "find
a meaning" for this sort of broken URL, what else should we guess at
interpreting?

Computers have to read this stuff, not humans.

Gerv