Gervase Markham wrote:
>> The average consumer (and me too) will say it works with NS4.76 or IE5
>> but not with Mozilla, and therefore Mozilla is broke. For perfectly good
>> evidence of this, take a look at the bug page at how many times this has
>> been resubmitted. It is the largest number I have so far stumbled across
>> (though I have not looked at a lot).
>
>
> There's a bigger issue here. Who do we respect more? Old and broken
> browsers, or W3C and other internet standards (such as RFCs)? If we "find
> a meaning" for this sort of broken URL, what else should we guess at
> interpreting?
>
> Computers have to read this stuff, not humans.
>
> Gerv
I think that if the page is broken then it's the fault of the webmaster
who created the page and Mozilla should tell the user that there is an
error in page and tell more about the error and to contact webmaster of
the badly coded page.
