in Win98 todays latest build it doesnt seem bad at all in mozilla. the only difference i can tell is the box on the right's border is dashed line in mozilla but solid in IE 5. And there are some tiny font differences..? Alan wrote: > I don't know if this is the right forum to mention this, if not please > reply with pointers to where it would be more benificial (other than > bugzilla). > > I just posted bug 83117 on bugzilla.mozilla.org regarding a nasty css > rendering problem under mozilla. > > http://staticred.net/nasty is visible perfectly in IE, and renders > properly. However that is the ONLY browser it's visible in. Mozilla > renders it horribly, Netscape 4.x has all CSS stripped out > (intentionally), opera renders it almost right except for an OVERFLOW > tag. > > Why this isn't just the case of a web designer who doesn't care about > anything but IE is that the page is w3 validated HTML 4.01 > Transitional complaint, using CSS1. The URL to see the validation is > http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fstaticred.net%2Fnasty&doctype=Inline > > > If this is a w3 validator bug, or if this validator is not being uses > as it should, etc, please let me know. However, mozilla is supposed > to be standards compliant up the wazoo, and this validator claims the > page is, yet only IE can render it. > > Thoughts? > > Alan >
