I withdraw my ridicule. Gervase Markham wrote: > > > Mozilla is confused by *redundant* CSS code*? Mercy, what happens when > > it's actually *incorrect*? > > > > *Yeah yeah, I know, "it's not in the Standard!!!!" Tell it to Bill. > > In fact, Mozilla is rendering this correctly, and IE is rendering it > incorrectly. The CSS, while valid, asked for a 0-width BODY tag, and so > that's what Mozilla did. Read the bug for the full story. > > That bug has now been marked INVALID. The reporter agrees with this > conclusion :-) > > Gerv
