Ian Hickson wrote:
> I'm confused by your argument.
Once you "sell a copy" (define it how you will), that person can then make
unlimited exactly copies and distribute them infinitely, thus rendering your
attempt to sell the software moot. Aside from custom written software for a
single client or user, selling GPLed software becomes a futile exercise.
Now, I'm NOT AGAINST the GPL, mind you. I think the most business friendly
approach to Open Source software is terms similar to id Software. The LGPL helps
to an extent, where you can just use external libraries, etc.
You have to admit, with the license permitting unlimited redistribution by the
licensee makes it harder to convince people to BUY it from you. The best model
is similar to Redhat, where you are basically selling the media and extras.
--
jesus X [ Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton sadism. ]
email [ jesusx @ who.net ]
web [ http://burntelectrons.com ] [ Updated April 29, 2001 ]
tag [ The Universe: It's everywhere you want to be. ]
warning [ All your base are belong to us. ]
