DeMoN_LaG wrote:

> JTK wrote:
> 
>>>> This better?  I have to apologize, I am not nearly nerdly enough to 
>>>> have known
>>>> that you needed a space after the two minuses.  And I'm using a 
>>>> web-based
>>>> newsgroup "reader", which Maozilla won't interface to to do such 
>>>> wonderful
>>>> things for me.
>>>>
>>> *gasp*  You are going to say that Mozilla can't access a web based 
>>> news service through the news client???
>>>
>>
>> No, I just did say it.  Sheesh, now you can't tell the difference 
>> between past
>> and future?!?
>>
>>
>>> Oh my god, how has this feature been left out.
>>>
>>
>> It'd impact AOL's bottom line.
> 
> 
> 
> Actually no.  See, Mozilla isn't owned by AOL.  The only limiting factor 
> would be the people who own the free web news services objecting to 
> their customers being able to use a news client.  News client = no 
> people on website looking at banner ads = no revenue.  What happened to 
> your business course there?
> 
> 
>>
>>
>>> I mean, IE has had this for, what, 5, 10 years now?  Oh?  IE doesn't 
>>> have this feature?  What is this?
>>>
>>
>> "This" is you going off the deep end yet again.  I'm using IE to use this
>> web-based newsreader.  IE doesn't have a newsreader.
> 
> 
> 
> No it's not me going off the deep end.  Mozilla's news client is a NNTP 
> compatible, AKA any standard news server news client.  It is not a web 
> browser for browsing a news site.  Mozilla's browser component does this 
> quite nicely.  Or do you not know how to type a URL?
> 
> 
>>
>> Holy Christ.
>>
>>
>>> No browser/news client anywhere has this feature?
>>>
>>
>> Not to my knowledge, no.  Sure seems like somebody could really be...
>> innovative... and add it to theirs.  Especially if there was an "Open" 
>> one
>> around, somewhere.
> 
> 
> 
> Yeah, it would be an interesting addition.  However, since there is no 
> standard for web based news, and you couldn't parse the HTML files the 
> server generates for you very easily, it would be quite a difficult 
> task.  Considering how much you bitch, maybe you oughta take a few years 
> of Computer basics and maybe then you can get some C++ classes, and then 
> you can write some code to do that.
> 
> 
>>
>>
>>> Oh, so you are a jackass too?
>>>
>>
>> No, I'm more of a "brick hithouse".  Skidmark.
> 
> 
> 
> WTF is a brick hithouse?
> 
> 
>>
>>
>>> Wow, I'm impresssed.  You lost the argument for yourself.
>>>
>>
>> Well I'd pretty much have to lose it myself, wouldn't I?  I mean 
>> seriously,
>> considering the "competition"... hehehehe, I can't even type the word 
>> with a
>> straight face!
> 
> 
> 
> I love your posts.  I get home from work at night, and I sit down and 
> what do I have?  It's like watching Comedy Central on the web.
> 
> 
>>
>>
>>> Genius
>>>
>>
>> Punctuation-forgetter.
> 
> 
> I fail to see the point.  This isn't english class.  When your whole 
> argument has been reduced to pointing out grammar and punctuation you 
> really have no argument left.  Why not just be quiet, and maybe less 
> people will laugh at you (unless they dig up an old post for kicks)
> 
> 

:) :) :)


Reply via email to