JTK wrote:
> So you also do not know what fixed and variable costs are.
No, I understand it perfectly. There is nothing more variable than intangible
assets.
> > You've done no such research to attempt to help your case in these
> > arguments.
> Um, I think a minor in business counts as "research" in this particular case,
> rabbi.
But even an MBA can know nothing about software programming. And despite your
minor is Econ., you don't seem able to differentiate between being in business
and making a profit. And when I corrected your error in relation to Redhat's
profitability, you never responded.
> > You've made not only under- and mis-informed
> > remarks,
> Such as?
Comments to Mozilla's 'bloat', speed relating to the use of XUL, to start with.
> > but patently untrue remarks,
> Quote please.
After being corrected about XUL, you persisted. Your comments on the market
penetration of both Mozilla, and Linux, plus additional projects based on
Mozilla technologies. All patently untrue.
> > and ones of total opinion (with no bearing
> > on fact) and stated THEM as fact.
> I only state facts. Nobody here cares about my opinions, and I certainly don't
> care about anyone elses. But of course it should be easy for you to find a
> counterexample, right?
I already have. Here's a verbatim quote:
"Just two at last count: you and the Savior, jesus X. I suspect the rest of the
crew here has had at least a few years of college and taken an Econ 101 class,
and hence knows the difference between fixed and variable costs."
I've taken Economics. I know exactly what you're discussing, and find that it's
riddled with factual errors doe to being under informed and willful ignorance.
The fact that I disagree with you doe snot seem to register with you as anything
other than being ignorant. A person who disagrees with you is not necessarily
ignorant. In the matters going on pertaining to Mozilla, I'd say I'm much more
qualified to discuss the technical details than you are.
Further more, you insist that Mozilla is Netscape, and vice versa. This is also
not true, and your insistence otherwise is not fact, but willful ignorance.
> Right?
> Hellooo?
I don't know what this is supposed to mean.
> > Should you not endeavour to follow your own
> > advice?
> Done and done.
No, as has been demonstrated in this post.
> Now, could you look up the definitions of fixed and variable cost and report
> back to Mr. Lag, since his school library is apparently lacking?
No, I am not his teacher, nor do I endeavor to be.
--
jesus X [ Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton sadism. ]
email [ jesusx @ who.net ]
web [ http://burntelectrons.com ] [ Updated April 29, 2001 ]
tag [ The Universe: It's everywhere you want to be. ]
warning [ All your base are belong to us. ]
