jesus X wrote:
> K-M does not use everything in Mozilla except the UI. It's just the renderer in
> another app. This does not constitute proof. That's the equivalent of running
> Quake 3 on a Pentium with a double speed CD drive, then running it on an Athlon
> 4 with a 36x drive, and claiming the speed increase is solely due to the CD
> drive.
I used to run UT on a P2 333 with 64 megs of RAM and a TNT2 card. Now I
run it on a Duron @ 842mhz with 384 megs of RAM and a Kyro II card. But
the real speed increase is because I got a new floppy drive. The floppy
was really holding me back before, but now that I got a new one I get
mad FPS.
> No, you stated NO ONE used either Mozilla or Linux. You stated NO ONE was
> developing applications with Mozilla. And please do not call be rabbi. I am
> neither Jewish, nor a rabbi, and frankly, it's childish. The joke was old after
> the first time you tried it.
I'm not sure he knows what Linux is. I think he may think it is a
process that runs under Windows NT.
> So, because I disagree with you, I am now lying. Incredible.
>
If you'd like to get technical with him, he's disagreeing with you, so
he's lying.
>>Technically no, practically yes.
>>
>
> You sound like Rush Limbaugh with his "monopoly on the truth". How does
> disagreement with you make someone ignorant?
Because he has no idea what he's talking about and can't possibly answer
with anything other than an attempted putdown/subject change, so he just
tries to insult you to get you off topic.
> More than I could recall, and in a number of languages.
>
I know a small amount of VB (very little, not enough to do anything
terribly useful). I do, however, have a nice knowledge of C++. I
probably would do some small things for the Moz project, except I didn't
start reading the source when it was released. I look through one
source file now and I have to go and look at a dozen other source and
header files just to figure out what each function call is, what the
different classes are for, etc. Just not enough time. Though, since I
am out of school after tomorrow, who knows
>
>>>Further more, you insist that Mozilla is Netscape, and vice versa. This is
>>>also not true,
>>>
>>It is true, and you're simply fooling yourself if you can't see it.
>>
>
> Please show proof of this. Rather than telling you that you are wrong, I want to
> see why you feel you are right on this topic.
>
I bet he doesn't answer
