Gervase Markham wrote: > > > No, in principle it is not open source whatsoever. Netscape 6 branches > > from Mozilla at certain points in development and features propietary to > > 6.x are added/refined, etc. > > That's not true; That is 100%+ true and you damn well know it Mr. Markham. Do not try to con these people further that AOL already has. > Netscape should, if we read the license, *IF*. > be making source > releases (at the same time it makes binary releases) of all the files in > Netscape 6.x under the MPL or NPL or another open source license. > So where's the code for that sweet AIM program? Yeah. > Gerv
- Is it better to replace Netscape 6.1 PR1 with Mozilla 0.9... Edwin Overmeer
- Re: Is it better to replace Netscape 6.1 PR1 with Mo... ZZT
- Re: Is it better to replace Netscape 6.1 PR1 wit... Jay Garcia
- Re: Is it better to replace Netscape 6.1 PR1... ZZT
- Re: Is it better to replace Netscape 6.1... Christopher Jahn
- Re: Is it better to replace Netscape 6.1... Jay Garcia
- Re: Is it better to replace Netscap... Gervase Markham
- Re: Is it better to replace Net... JTK
- Re: Is it better to replace... DeMoN_LaG
- Re: Is it better to replace... jesus X
- Re: Is it better to replace... Gervase Markham
- Re: Is it better to replace... JTK
- Re: Is it better to replace... W.
- Re: Is it better to replace... jesus X
- Re: Is it better to replace Net... Ian Hickson
- Re: Is it better to replace Net... jesus X
- Re: Is it better to replace... Gervase Markham
- Re: Is it better to replace Netscape 6.1 PR1 wit... Henri Sivonen
