Re: Is it better to replace Netscape 6.1 PR1 with Mozilla 0.9.2 ?

[DeMoN_LaG]

JTK wrote:

> Gervase Markham wrote:
> 
>>>No, in principle it is not open source whatsoever. Netscape 6 branches
>>>from Mozilla at certain points in development and features propietary to
>>>6.x are added/refined, etc.
>>>
>>That's not true;
>>
> 
> That is 100%+ true and you damn well know it Mr. Markham.  Do not try to
> con these people further that AOL already has.


No it isn't.


> 
> 
>>Netscape should, if we read the license,
>>
> 
> *IF*.


Yeah, you probably can't read too well, can you?


> 
> 
>>be making source
>>releases (at the same time it makes binary releases) of all the files in
>>Netscape 6.x under the MPL or NPL or another open source license.
>>
>>
> 
> So where's the code for that sweet AIM program?  Yeah.


AIM wasn't written as code under the NPL/MPL.  However, changes Netscape 
makes to the Mozilla source *is* available, typically it ends up back in 
the trunk again.  You lose again


>  
> 
>>Gerv
>>