In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Asa Dotzler wrote: > We should definitely tell anyone interested in contributing > documentation to mozilla.org which will help people get involved with > coding and testing that we don't want it because it's not perfectly > standards compliant. Yeah, that's a great way to help this project. > Just what it needs. Fewer docs are sure to make it easier for folks to > get involved. > > Whatever. > Asa, the invalid HTML in question was on the front page, which (IMO) should be running at a somewhat higher standard than user-contributed docs. Bug 89885 filed; if nothing is fixed by the time the new site layout arrives, I'll go back and kill it. -- Chris Hoess
- Re: OT: about criticising o... Parish
- Re: OT: about criticising o... Niko Pavlicek
- Re: OT: about criticising o... JTK
- Re: poor HTML on mozilla.or... Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.
- Re: poor HTML on mozilla.or... Gervase Markham
- Re: poor HTML on mozilla.or... Henno Buschmann
- Re: poor HTML on mozilla.or... Gord McFee
- Re: poor HTML on mozilla.or... RV
- Re: poor HTML on mozilla.or... Gord McFee
- Re: poor HTML on mozilla.or... Steve Bowen
- Re: poor HTML on mozilla.org Chris Hoess
- Re: poor HTML on mozilla.org Michael Nahrath
- Re: poor HTML on mozilla.org (was: wow) Jon Hall
- Re: poor HTML on mozilla.org (was: wow) Gervase Markham
- Re: poor HTML on mozilla.org (was: wow) Henri Sivonen
- Re: poor HTML on mozilla.org (was: w... Gervase Markham
- Doctype-Sniffing and poor HTML on mozilla.org (wa... Michael Nahrath
- Re: Doctype-Sniffing and poor HTML on mozill... Gervase Markham
- Re: Doctype-Sniffing and poor HTML on mo... Peter Lairo
- Re: Doctype-Sniffing and poor HTML o... Michael Nahrath
- Re: Doctype-Sniffing and poor HT... Henri Sivonen
