Asa Dotzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We should definitely tell anyone interested in contributing documentation
> to mozilla.org which will help people get involved with coding and testing
> that we don't want it because it's not perfectly standards compliant.
This is the usual way Mozilla deals with errorous or otherwise
bad code.
The other way is to help content- or program authors to improve the
quality of their work by revising it and helping them to learn.
> Yeah, that's a great way to help this project.
You overexaggerate!
How could someone who is working with tools like bugzilla,
CVS and a C++ compiler have problems with simple services
like <http://validator.w3.org/> and HTML-Tidy?
> Just what it needs. Fewer docs are sure to make it easier for folks to
> get involved.
Using invalid code for documentation about web authoring and
standard compliance costs at least half of its credibility.
Greeting, Michi
(... just loading http://www.mozilla.org/README-cvs.html ...)
--
Beitr�ge zu HTML, CSS und Netzkultur <http://www.subotnik.net/>
Zur �bersicht (keine private Seite) <http://michael.nahrath.de/>
