Thomas Betz wrote:
>
> I bet Keith was looking for an answer like the one Henri gave.
I bet he was looking for exactly the response I gave.
> Your
> comments were worthless.
>
Yours however is highly illuminating.
> JTK wrote:
>
> > Keith Chant wrote:
> >
> >>Why is it that the Netscape 6/6.1 beta browser renders some pages so
> >>differently than does Navigator 4.xx, IE 4 through 5.5 and Opera 5?
> >>
> >
> > 1. Mozilla is a long way from being a released product and has many,
> > many defects.
> > 2. NN6/6.1 is called "released" by AOL, but is merely Mozilla with the
> > "Mozilla" name filed off and overstamped with "Netscape".
> >
> >
> >> I
> >>am trying to design a site to look good in all browsers but cannot get
> >>it to work in NS6.
> >>
> >
> > There is no reason to do this. All the NN6.x's and Mozilla's combined
> > are less than 1% of the total browser market, and exactly zero percent
> > of the "normal users" browser market.
> >
> >
> >> Is this something they are going to resolve or does
> >>the new browser just not work the same?
> >>
> >
> > The defects that AOL deems necessary to fix will be fixed, to the extent
> > which AOL deems them to need fixing.
> >
> >
> >> For an example of what I am
> >>talking about visit: http://www.hotmetalpro.com/ and look at the
> >>navigational bar on the left compared in different browsers.
> >>
> >>I find it interesting that my page, which is HTML 3.2 compliant will
> >>render identically in Netscape 4.xx, IE 4, IE 5, IE 5.5 and Opera 5 yet
> >>in NS 6/6.1 beta it renders very differently?
> >>
> >>Can anybody explain this?
> >>
> >
> > AOL.
> >
