What Henri Sivonen did was giving correct answers. Your answers are void
and useless.
However, Yes Mozilla is not a released product and it has a long way to
go, that is enough excuse for all the compliants. if you have a comment
about NS 6 / 6.1 here is not the place for it.
if you doesnt like stg in Mozilla, or there is a bug go to
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org
like everybody does.
if you want to take notice about a bug, or discuss some aspects, they
are welcome in newsgroups i believe.
Ahmet
JTK wrote:
> Keith Chant wrote:
>
>>Why is it that the Netscape 6/6.1 beta browser renders some pages so
>>differently than does Navigator 4.xx, IE 4 through 5.5 and Opera 5?
>>
>
> 1. Mozilla is a long way from being a released product and has many,
> many defects.
> 2. NN6/6.1 is called "released" by AOL, but is merely Mozilla with the
> "Mozilla" name filed off and overstamped with "Netscape".
>
>
>> I
>>am trying to design a site to look good in all browsers but cannot get
>>it to work in NS6.
>>
>
> There is no reason to do this. All the NN6.x's and Mozilla's combined
> are less than 1% of the total browser market, and exactly zero percent
> of the "normal users" browser market.
>
>
>> Is this something they are going to resolve or does
>>the new browser just not work the same?
>>
>
> The defects that AOL deems necessary to fix will be fixed, to the extent
> which AOL deems them to need fixing.
>
>
>> For an example of what I am
>>talking about visit: http://www.hotmetalpro.com/ and look at the
>>navigational bar on the left compared in different browsers.
>>
>>I find it interesting that my page, which is HTML 3.2 compliant will
>>render identically in Netscape 4.xx, IE 4, IE 5, IE 5.5 and Opera 5 yet
>>in NS 6/6.1 beta it renders very differently?
>>
>>Can anybody explain this?
>>
>
> AOL.
>
