HEY JTK: GO TO HELL
JTK wrote:
> Thomas Betz wrote:
>
>>I bet Keith was looking for an answer like the one Henri gave.
>>
>
> I bet he was looking for exactly the response I gave.
>
>
>>Your
>>comments were worthless.
>>
>>
>
> Yours however is highly illuminating.
>
>
>>JTK wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Keith Chant wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Why is it that the Netscape 6/6.1 beta browser renders some pages so
>>>>differently than does Navigator 4.xx, IE 4 through 5.5 and Opera 5?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>1. Mozilla is a long way from being a released product and has many,
>>>many defects.
>>>2. NN6/6.1 is called "released" by AOL, but is merely Mozilla with the
>>>"Mozilla" name filed off and overstamped with "Netscape".
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>I
>>>>am trying to design a site to look good in all browsers but cannot get
>>>>it to work in NS6.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>There is no reason to do this. All the NN6.x's and Mozilla's combined
>>>are less than 1% of the total browser market, and exactly zero percent
>>>of the "normal users" browser market.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Is this something they are going to resolve or does
>>>>the new browser just not work the same?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>The defects that AOL deems necessary to fix will be fixed, to the extent
>>>which AOL deems them to need fixing.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>For an example of what I am
>>>>talking about visit: http://www.hotmetalpro.com/ and look at the
>>>>navigational bar on the left compared in different browsers.
>>>>
>>>>I find it interesting that my page, which is HTML 3.2 compliant will
>>>>render identically in Netscape 4.xx, IE 4, IE 5, IE 5.5 and Opera 5 yet
>>>>in NS 6/6.1 beta it renders very differently?
>>>>
>>>>Can anybody explain this?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>AOL.
>>>
>>>
